
|
AZITHROMYCIN
(brand names: Zithromax, Zithromax Z-Pak)
Pharmacological category:
antidyskinetic
|
 |
|
| |
 |
Reviews |
|
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan
25;(1):CD004404.
Antibiotics for whooping cough (pertussis).
Altunaiji S, Kukuruzovic R, Curtis N, Massie J.
Zayed Military Hospital, Zayed Street, PO Box 3740, Abu Dhabi, UNITED ARAB
EMIRATES.
BACKGROUND: Whooping cough is a highly contagious disease. Infants are the
population at highest risk of severe disease and death. Erythromycin for
14 days is recommended for treatment and contact prophylaxis but this regime
is considered inconvenient and prolonged. The value of contact prophylaxis
is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To study the benefits and risks of antibiotic
treatment of and contact prophylaxis against whooping cough. SEARCH STRATEGY:
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane
Library Issue 1, 2004); MEDLINE (January 1966 to February 2004); EMBASE
(January 1974 to August 2003); conference abstracts and reference lists
of articles were searched. Study investigators and pharmaceutical companies
were approached for additional information (published or unpublished studies).
There were no constraints based on language or publication status. SELECTION
CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of antibiotics
for treatment of and contact prophylaxis against whooping cough were included
in the systematic review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least three reviewers
independently extracted data and assessed the quality of each trial. MAIN
RESULTS: Twelve trials with 1,720 participants met the inclusion criteria.
Ten trials investigated treatment regimens and two investigated prophylaxis
regimens. The quality of the trials was variable. Results showed that short-term
antibiotics (azithromycin for three days, clarithromycin for seven days,
or erythromycin estolate for seven days) were equally effective with long-term
antibiotic treatment (erythromycin estolate or erythromycin for 14 days)
in the microbiological eradication of Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis)
from the nasopharynx. The relative risk (RR) was 1.02 (95% confidence interval
(CI) 0.98 to 1.05). Side effects were fewer with short-term treatment (RR
0.66; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.83). There were no differences in clinical improvement
or microbiological relapse between short and long-term treatment regimens.
Contact prophylaxis (of contacts older than six months of age) with antibiotics
did not significantly improve clinical symptoms or the number of cases that
developed culture positive B. pertussis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics
are effective in eliminating B. pertussis from patients with the disease,
rendering them non-infectious, but do not alter the subsequent clinical
course of the illness. Effective regimens include: three days of azithromycin,
seven days of clarithromycin, seven or 14 days of erythromycin estolate,
and 14 days of erythromycin ethylsuccinate. Considering microbiological
clearance and side effects, three days of azithromycin or seven days of
clarithromycin are the best regimens. Seven days of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
also appeared to be effective for the eradication of B. pertussis from the
nasopharynx and may serve as an alternative antibiotic treatment for patients
who cannot tolerate a macrolide. There is insufficient evidence to determine
the benefit of prophylactic treatment of pertussis contacts. |
Antibiot Khimioter. 2004;49(8-9):34-5,
37-42. [Efficacy and safety of azithromycin prophylaxis
of respiratory tract infections in military community]. [Article
in Russian]
The efficacy and safety of azithromycin prophylaxis of community-acquired
pneumonia (CAP) in young adults in a military training centre of the Ministry
of Defence of the Russian Federation located in the Central European Region
of Russia were studied. Two prophylactic regimens with azithromycin vs.
the control were evaluated: azithromycin, 500 mg/w for 8 weeks (R1), azithromycin,
1500 mg once upon the enrolment (R2) and no drugs (R3). Nasopharyngeal carriage
of Streptococcuspneumoniae and its susceptibility to antibacterials were
estimated thrice: before the exposure, after the exposure within the 9th
week and after the exposure within the 20th week. The MLS(B) phenotype was
suspected when the isolates were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin.
During the observation period of 22 weeks CAP was diagnosed in 20.2% of
678 subjects in group R3, 8.6% of 508 subjects in group R1 (Risk Ratio =0.4,
95% Cl = 0.3-0.6) and 10.3% of 507 subjects in group R2 (Risk Ratio = 0.5,
95% Cl = 0.4-0.7). The S.pneumoniae carriage rate at visit 0 was 34-35%,
within the 9th week it was 75, 66 and 50% (p<0.05) in groups R1, R2 and
R3 respectively, and within the 20th week it was 69, 57 and 36% in the same
groups (p<0.05). At visit 0 no macrolide resistance was detected in any
of the 40 isolates tested. The background level of intermediate penicillin
resistance was revealed in 0-14% of the isolates. Dramatic growth of macrolide
resistance was observed within the 9th week in group R1 (95.7%, 44 resistant
strains, Azithro+Clinda resistance in 37% of them) and in group R2 (89.5%,
34 resistant strains, Azithro+Clinda resistance in 11.9% of them). By the
20th week the resistance rate decreased up to 40 % (16 resistant strains,
Azithro+Clinda resistance in 10% of them) in group R1 and up to 22.6% (7
resistant strains, Azithro+Clinda resistance in 5.4% of them) in group R2.
As for penicillin resistance, no unfavourable shifts were detected. The
study demonstrated the effectiveness of the azithromycin prophylaxis of
CAP in healthy young men at high transient risk of the disease, as well
as the possible risk for selection of resistant endemic pathogens. |
| J Antimicrob Chemother
2002 May;49(5):875-8
A randomized controlled trial of azithromycin versus
doxycycline/ciprofloxacin for the syndromic management of sexually transmitted
infections in a resource-poor setting
Rustomjee R, Kharsany AB, Connolly CA, Karim SS
Unit for Clinical and Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, Medical Research
Council, King George V Hospital, PO Box 19494, Domerton 4015
A randomized controlled trial was carried out to assess the effectiveness
of azithromycin versus a standard regimen with doxycycline/ciprofloxacin
in the treatment of sexually transmitted infections in a resource-poor
environment. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis was cured in 23/24 (95.8%)
of women in the azithromycin arm versus 19/21 (90.5%) in the doxycycline
arm (P = 0.6), resulting in three treatment failures. Gonorrhoea was cured
in 55/56 (98.2%) women, with one treatment failure in a patient with concomitant
C. trachomatis infection. These results indicate that a single oral dose
of azithromycin may prove to be a more effective and convenient treatment
for sexually transmitted infections in women in a resource-poor environment. |
| Sex Transm Dis 2002
Aug;29(8):486-90
A randomized, comparative pilot study of azithromycin
versus benzathine penicillin G for treatment of early syphilis
Hook EW 3rd, Martin DH, Stephens J, Smith BS, Smith
K
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine and; Jefferson
County Department of Health, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0007, USA.
BACKGROUND: Penicillin is the only medication currently recommended for
treatment of early syphilis in non-penicillin-allergic patients. Preliminary
data suggest that azithromycin may be effective for syphilis therapy.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, comparative pilot study of intramuscular
injections of benzathine penicillin G and two oral azithromycin regimens
for treatment of syphilis. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with
early syphilis to treatment with either intramuscular injections of 2.4
million units of benzathine penicillin G or azithromycin administered
orally, either as a single 2.0-g dose or as two 2.0-g doses given 1 week
apart. Serological response to therapy was evaluated at 3, 6, 9, and 12
months following therapy. Participants whose rapid plasma reagin (RPR)
test became nonreactive or whose RPR titer decreased > or =2 dilutions
were classified as responding to therapy. When serological tests did not
show a response to therapy, the treatment was classified as a failure
if RPR titers increased > or =2 dilutions. Nonresponders were those
whose serologic titers remained within +/-1 dilution of the initial RPR
titer. RESULTS: Cumulative response rates were as follows: benzathine
penicillin G, 86% (12 of 14); azithromycin, 2.0-g single dose, 94% (16
of 17); and azithromycin, two 2.0-g doses given 1 week apart, 83% (24
of 29). Therapy failed for one patient treated with benzathine penicillin
and one patient treated with the two-dose azithromycin regimen, whereas
in six patients the clinical manifestations of infection resolved but
there was no serological response. CONCLUSION: Oral therapy with 2.0 g
of azithromycin as a single dose or as two doses 1 week apart is a promising
alternative to therapy with benzathine penicillin G for syphilis and should
be studied further. |
| |
 |
Drug information |
|
| GENERIC NAME: azithromycin
BRAND NAME: Zithromax
DRUG CLASS AND MECHANISM: Azithromycin is a semi-synthetic
macrolide antibiotic chemically related to erythromycin and clarithromycin
(Biaxin). It is effective against a wide variety of bacteria organisms,
such as Hemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae,
Staphylococcus aureus, and mycobacterium avium, and many others. It is
unusual in that it stays in the body for quite a while, allowing for once
a day dosing and for shorter treatment courses for most infections.
Azithromycin, like all macrolide antibiotics, prevents bacteria from
growing by interfering with their ability to make proteins. Due to the
differences in the way proteins are made in bacteria and humans, the macrolide
antibiotics do not interfere with humans' ability to make proteins.
PREPARATIONS: Capsules (red): 250mg; Suspension: 100
mg/teaspoon; 200 mg/teaspoon.
STORAGE: Capsules should be kept below 30°C (86°F).
Suspension should be kept between 5° and 30°C (41° and 86°F).
PRESCRIBED FOR: Azithromycin is effective against susceptible
bacteria causing infections of the middle ear, tonsillitis, throat infections,
laryngitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, sinuses and. It is also effective against
certain sexually transmitted infectious diseases, such as nongonococcal
urethritis and cervicitis.
DOSING: Azithromycin should be taken at least one hour
before or two hours after meals since it may bind to food and not be absorbed
from the intestine. For most infections, azithromycin is taken once daily
for a relatively short course of treatment (usually five days). The first
dose is often a "double dose," twice as much as the remainder
of the doses given. For acute bacterial sinusitis, azithromycin way be
taken once daily for three days.
DRUG INTERACTIONS: Unlike erythromycin and clarithromycin,
azithromycin is generally considered free of interactions with most other
medicines. It is recommended that azithromycin not be taken at the same
time as aluminum- or magnesium- based antacids, such as Mylanta or Maalox
because antacids will bind the azithromycin and prevent it from being
absorbed from the intestine.
PREGNANCY: There are no adequate studies of azithromycin
in pregnant women. However, studies in animals suggest no important effects
on the fetus. Azithromycin therefore can be used in pregnancy if the physician
feels that it is clearly necessary.
NURSING MOTHERS: It is not known if azithromycin is
secreted in breast milk.
SIDE EFFECTS: Azithromycin is generally well tolerated.
The most common side effects are diarrhea or loose stools, nausea, abdominal
pain, and vomiting, each of which may occur in fewer than one in twenty
persons who receive azithromycin. Rarer side effects include abnormal
liver tests, allergic reactions, and nervousness.
Caution! Before starting
to take this medicine, it is vital that you should consult your doctor!
Do not use it on your own initiative, without medical advice.
Also, you should read carefully important health information about this
drug given here:
my.webmd.com |
| |
 |
Order now ! |
|
|
ZITHROMAX-SUMAMED
Substance: Azithromycin
Manufacturer: Pliva/Sanofi
|
|
Dosage |
Packing |
Price |
Pay now |
250 mg |
6 tab |
USD 37.00 |
|
250 mg |
18 tab |
USD 0.00 |
|
500 mg |
3 tab |
USD 37.00 |
|
500 mg |
6 tab |
USD 69.00 |
|
500 mg |
15 tab |
USD 129.00 |
|
Dosage |
Packing |
Price |
Pay now |
250 mg |
12 tab |
USD 24.00 |
|
250 mg |
24 tab |
USD 38.00 |
|
250 mg |
48 tab |
USD 63.00 |
|
|
|
| |
| 
|
|